Good post on company debt

Steve Alexander has written a good basic article on debt financing used by a company. Worth a read.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Good post on company debt

Video lectures at Columbia Business School

I found some excellent educational material on Columbia’s website. They have archived videos of guest lectures by world renowned investors such as Thomas Russo, Chris Browne, Michael Price, Glenn Greenberg, Mohnish Pabrai, Li Lu.

The lectures are about 60-90 minutes in length and provide good insights into the investing styles and philosophies of these successful investors. Check the lectures here.

Posted in Mohnish Pabrai, Podcast, Tom Russo, Tweedy Browne, value investing | 2 Comments

Option Strategies For The Value Investor – Part I (Writing Put Options)

In this first post, I present my favorite option strategy – Selling Put Options. Yes, I am talking about options on a value investing website. Please read on and I am sure you will find it interesting. I will follow up with more posts on other option strategies for a value investor if there is an interest.

Often times when I like a company and want to purchase some shares, the stock is trading a bit higher than where I would like to buy. I could do several things here

1) Just wait patiently till the price comes in my buy range.
2) Place a limit order to buy the shares at a lower price.
3) Buy some shares now and add more as the price moves down OR
4) Sell puts on the shares at a lower strike price.

Read the rest of the article on GuruFocus.

Posted in Option Strategy | 2 Comments

Netflix vs. GameStop

Let us look at two popular stocks among investors (both long and short).

Lets start with Netflix (NFLX). Netflix, Inc. provides online movie rental subscription services in the United States. You can rent movies in the form of DVDs that are mailed to you and you can also view movies via streaming on your PC or a host of other devices such as XBOX, PS3 etc. Netflix is clearly a great brand and is loved by its 12 million plus customers. Netflix has also made a lot of money for its shareholders. 

Gamestop (GME) is the largest video game retailer in the world. It operates more than 6500 stories in the US, Canada, Australia, UK, France and other European countries. Gamestop is a popular destination for gamers to get their hands on the latest games and consoles as well as trade their used games. 

Let us look at some of financial metrics for Netflix and Gamestop:
Netflix (NFLX)
Gamestop (GME)
Share price
$118.39
$18.95
Market Cap
6190 million
2870 million
Enterprise Value
6160 million
2890 million
P/E
53.6
8.2
P/ FCF
22
5.8
EV / OCF
19
4.4
EV / EBITDA
24.5
3.6
P/S
3.5
0.3
P/B
42
1.1
PEG Ratio
1.8
0.7
Revenue
1770 million
9180 million
EBITDA
251 million
802 million
Net Income
126 million
382 million
5 year avg revenue growth
27.5%
40%
5 year avg EPS growth
47%
35%
5 year Operating margin
7%
7%
5 year average ROE
26%
15%
5 year median FCF growth
20.5%
27.7%
Short % of float
22.5%
18.8%
From the market cap, you will notice that the market values Netflix as more than twice GameStop.
Next, look at the valuation metrics. On a P/E basis, Netflix is valued at almost 54x earnings while GameStop trades at a low 8x earnings. If you run down any other valuation metric be it cash flow, free cash flow or the EBITDA multiple, Gamestop is trading at a very cheap valuation compared to Netflix. Clearly, the market thinks Netflix deserves this high multiple and Gamestop deserves a low valuation. However, if you look at the 5 year average revenue growth, you see that Gamestop has been ahead of Netflix. Netflix is ahead on the 5 year earnings growth. However, when it comes to operating margins, Netflix does not have any better margins than the retailer that is Gamestop.
One reason everyone loves Netflix is due to the imminent death of BlockBuster (BBI). Even though there is growing competition from RedBox and its DVD renting kiosks which are mushrooming all over the country this has been ignored. The same rules do not apply for Gamestop however. Best Buy (BBY) has recently announced that it will attempt to buy and sell used games once again in its stores. And then there is the threat of digital downloads, streaming games via Onlive, games sold at Walmart, Amazon, Ebay etc etc.
I employ the Discounted cash flow valuation method (DCF) to see what is priced into the stock. Of late, I have been using DCF in a non-traditional fashion. Rather than trying to predict cash flows, I enter in the growth rate and discount rate that will give me the intrinsic value as the current stock price. This lets me see the expectations built into the stock or Price implied expectations (PIE). I use a standard 12% discount rate for all such computations.
Netflix has to grow FCF at 19.6% per year for the next 10 years to justify its current stock price. Now, Netflix was able to grow its FCF at a median rate of 20.5% over the last 5 year period. However, over 10 years this drops to a rate of 8% growth. If Netflix were to slow down its FCF growth rate to 8%, then the intrinsic value is $65. (a potential drop of 45% )
In the case of GameStop, if FCF were to reduce by 8% per year for the next 10 years then I would arrive at the current stock price. If however, FCF can grow just at 1% for the next 10 years then I arrive at an intrinsic value of $28. (potential gain of 47%). I am not even using the past 5 year and 10 year FCF growth rate of Gamestop which was much higher than 1%.
Conclusion: Netflix does not appear cheap by any traditional valuation measure. Employing reverse DCF shows us that extremely high FCF growth has been priced into Netflix to justify current prices. Netflix is clearly a high expectations stock. The potential downside is much higher than the potential upside.
Gamestop on the other hand is trading cheaply by any of the valuation measures. Employing reverse DCF confirms this valuation where a negative FCF growth rate is priced in at current prices. Gamestop is clearly a low expectations stock. The potential downside is much lower than the potential upside.
The interesting part is that a large % of the shares of both companies are trading short. Netflix short is at 22% and Gamestop is at 19%. A lot of investors and traders are betting that Netflix and Gamestop should trade down. I can understand shorting a high valuation and high expectation stock such as Netflix trading at 50x earnings. However, shorting a stock at 8x earnings is beyond me. I guess the market thinks that Gamestop should not exist or is worth much less.

Disclosure: I am long Gamestop via shares and call options at the time of publishing this post. I do not have a position in Netflix currently. My positions may change at any time without any further updates. Please conduct your own research before considering investments based on these or any ideas on this blog. This post is to be considered as my research and not advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any of the stocks discussed.
Posted in Stock analysis | Tagged , | Comments Off on Netflix vs. GameStop

Mohnish Pabrai’s use of checklist in investing

I have been listening to the Guru Investors lectures and presentations on Columbia’s website.
Today, I listened to a talk given by 
Mohnish Pabrai early this year.

He talked about the idea of using a checklist that he runs against each of his new investment ideas before investing. The checklist has about 65 questions and is growing slowly. In his checklist, he maintains a list of failed investments, made by which investor and why it failed.

He even gave a way to build the checklist. Look at all the quarterly 13F filings for any great value investor and assume that all investments were made at the mid point of the quarter. Then, look at the next 13F filing to see if any of the investments dropped out. Assume that the investment was sold at the half way point of the quarter. For any investment that dropped in value, analyze why it dropped in value and that would have caused the investor to sell the investment. He said this can be done for all the great investors Buffett, Munger, Klarman, Whitman to develop a great checklist.

He says he does not come across any investment idea that passes all the checklist questions. Pabrai says that he first does his research and then before pulling the trigger he runs his checklist in 30 minutes. Some time there are questions in the checklist that he does not know the answer to. He has to go back and do more research to find those answers and re-run the checklist.

Pabrai says that the checklist has made one change in his portfolio management style. Earlier, Pabrai ran a 10 stock portfolio. After a few of his stocks went to 0, he realized that this was painful. He heard Seth Klarman talk about portfolio sizing. He now uses his checklist to help him decide how much he should invest in an idea. The max  is 10% – very rarely. Most are 5%, then some are 2-3% and then ofcourse 0%.

Posted in Checklist, Mohnish Pabrai, portfolio sizing | 2 Comments

Use of EBITDA in valuation

This summer I have taken a Private Equity course at the University of Texas at Dallas as part of my MBA coursework. In this course, the instructor employs case based discussions along with industry speakers. 


In the first few cases, we focussed on Levered Buy Outs (LBO). It was interesting to learn that private equity investors also focussed on cash flows just as a public equity investor should. The measure often used by private equity investors is EBITDA or Earnings Before Interest Taxes Depreciation and Amortization. Now, EBITDA is not the same as cash from operations however it is often used as a quick shortcut for cash flows.  


In an LBO, a private equity investor takes a public company (or a division of a public company) private by taking on more debt or levering up the company. The rational is that the company has good consistent cash flows and those cash flows can service the debt taken on. The Private equity investor would typically contribute 20-30% of the transaction amount in equity and the rest would be debt. After the financial crisis of 2008, the equity investment needed in LBOs is in the 40-50% range and the transaction sizes have greatly reduced. 


One of the reasons for using EBITDA rather than EBIT or Net Income is that when you compare companies across the world which have different capital structures as well as different tax rates and depreciation schedules, it makes sense to adjust for all these differences. EBITDA is an easy way to adjust for this and compare such companies. In the podcast by theValueGuys, Val also often refers to the EV/EBITDA as a form of valuation. Read about this show in this post.


I found that Tom Russo also uses EBITDA as a measure when looking at investment candidates. Here is an exercept from his talk at the Value Investor Congress 



In 1989 (I started investigating foreign companies in ’87) this is where it starts. Weetabix’s EBITDA was 19 million pounds and it had 7 million pounds of cash. I determined the business was worth 8 times EBITDA plus cash, less debt, and I came up with an intrinsic value of 13 pounds. With 11.87 million shares outstanding it was trading at 5.95 pounds per share. Then each pound was worth US$1.61 So that’s the beginning of the story. Now, I would mention that I used the word EBITDA, which Buffett this weekend suggested was false signs and all sorts of horrors would ensue if you even mentioned those six letters in rough approximation to each other. But for me at least, EBITDA is useful because it helps me cross countries because of different depreciation schedules and amortization schedules.
It’s one thing to say in a U.S. context that you’ve looked at pre-tax earnings rather than EBITDA. But when you start to look at Heineken versus Cadbury Schweppes versus Budweiser, and if you don’t adjust for those non-cash charges — and one way to do it is using EBITDA — you have a more difficult time comparing across the market. I have used EBITDA, and I confess it in front of you.



Now, I also consider the EV/EBITDA multiple of a company I am trying to invest in or consider selling along with other measures of valuation. I also consider the EBITDA multiple of its public competitors to see what is being offered in general for similar companies. 


Let us look at some fashion retailers.


American Eagle (AEO) :       4.5
Abercombie & Fitch (ANF) :  5.9
Aeropostale (ARO) :            5.1
Hot Topic             :            3
J Crew                               6
Gap                                   3.6


Retailers throw out good cash flow most of the times, however they can be considered cyclical and often fall out of favor with their fashion fickle customers. 


Caveats:
1) Capex: EBITDA does not take into account the capex required by a business (as compared to Free cash flow which is Cash from operations – Capex). An adjustment that one can make is to look at 
EV / EBITDA – Capex. 


After accounting for capex if the valuation is not as attractive, then you can pass it over. 


Example: Consider Tenet Healthcare (THC)
EV : $5.85 billion
EBITDA: $1 billion
You will see it trades at a somewhat attractive 5.84x EBITDA. However, if you subtract capex of $456 million from EBITDA, you will arrive at this adjusted measure of 10.74x. Clearly, not as attractive as originally thought.




2) Interest coverage/ high leverage: EBITDA also ignores the interest payment required and the existing level of leverage in the company. I would advocate looking at two additional measures.
(i) Interest coverage as indicated by EBIT/ Interest expense. A low interest coverage should be a red flag. 


Coming back to our THC example, interest coverage = 1.46. A very low number.


(ii) LT Debt / EBITDA  or Debt / Equity: Graham advised against investment in a company where Debt is 2x equity. 


If you look at THC, LT Debt = $4.27 billion and equity = $646 million. 
So, LT Debt / EBITDA = 4.27x and Debt / Equity = 6.6x.

Disclaimer: Long ARO

Posted in Tom Russo, valuation | 4 Comments

Book Summary – The Little Book of Value Investing by Chris Browne

I am presenting my summary of thebook “The Little Book of Value Investing” by Chris Browne. ChrisBrowne who passed away in 2009 was one of the great value investors over the past 30+ years.
 

Chapter 1 : : Buy stocks on sale. The basic concept of Value Investing is “Buying abusiness for far less than it is worth”. Value investing is not a set ofhard and fast rules. When prices drop, people buy more of the things they wantand need, except in the stock market. Everyone seems to think that they shouldbuy stocks that are rising and sell those that are falling. Reasons: Herdmentality. It’s ok for me to lose money as long as long as others are alsolosing. Investors feel disillusioned when the stocks they own or marketsdecline significantly. This prevents them from buying stocks when they go down.They get scared. The time to buy stocks is when they are ON SALE and not whenthey are high priced because everyone wants to own them. Growth investing:There is nothing wrong with owning great businesses that can grow at fastrates. The fault lies in the price that investors pay. Just like it makes senseto buy cars and jeans on sale, it makes sense to buy stocks on sale too. Stockson sale will give you more value in return for your dollars.
Chapter 2: What’s a business worth? Two principles of value investing: What is a business worth(intrinsic value) Don’t lose money (margin of Safety) Intrinsic value enablesinvestors to determine if a particular stock is a bargain and also if a stockthey own is overvalued. When overvalued stocks are revalued by the market,there is permanent capital loss. Two approaches to intrinsic value. Financialratios are indicators of value. 2nd is the appraisal method. Stock prices oftentrade for far more or far less than intrinsic value. Most investors move fromextreme pessimism to jubilant optimism. These emotions drive stock prices toextreme overvaluation and under-valuation. Rational value investors sit backand wait for the market to offer stocks for less than they are worth and to buythe same stocks back for more than their worth.  
Chapter 3: Don’t lose money. As a company increases it net worth or intrinsic value overtime, the value of the shares will increase. If the price of the stock rises fromless than intrinsic value to intrinsic value over time, you have a win/win.When you pay full price for a stock ( intrinsic value), future gains may belimited to company’s internal growth rate and dividends Graham wanted to buystocks selling at two-third (66%) or less of their intrinsic value. If correct,the stock could rise 50% and still not be overvalued (99% of IV). If the markethit a rough patch, he knew what he owned was worth more than what he paid forit. Avoid investing in companies that have a lot of debt relative to theirnet worth. Such companies are far riskier investments than companies withexcess cash. Also, such companies cede a measure of control to their lenders. Diversificationprovides a margin of safety and insurance against downturn in a few stocks/industries. Have a broadlydiversified portfolio of stocks across industries. Hold a minimum 10 stocks ina portfolio. Lets you be contrarian. Lastly, if stocks are cheap buythem. Ignore the noise around you and take advantage. Reverse is true also. Ifstocks valuations are reaching or exceeding intrinsic value and there is nomargin of safety, one must sell. Buy in bad times and sell in good times.  
Chapter 4: Buy earnings on Cheap. (The lower the price, the higher the return) – Buying LowP/E has worked over the years in all countries all industries. – Earnings yield= inverse of P/E – Use it to compare to other investments. – Consider inflationeffects on purchasing power – Trailing P/E (rear view mirror) v/s Forward P/E (oftenoptimistic projections) – Graham looked for cos with stable record of earnings,predictable. – Buying cheap on past earnings for such stable cos is good. -Discussion on Cash flow and FCF and its merits. – Chris also looks at low P/Ein terms of their worth to a potential acquirer. – EBITDA and how LBOs useEBITDA. Measure of debt serviceability. – Low P/E works in good and bad markets- Wait longer in bear markets to see returns. Best part of Low P/E approach isthat it forces you to buy stocks when cheap and while fear is high. – Bestopportunities are preceded by much pain and not great times. – Low P/E stockare low expectation companies (as opposed to high p/e stocks). – When low p/ecompany reports bad news, effect is minimal as its priced in. Good news resultsin a pop. (opposite in high p/e)
Chapter 5: Low P/B stocks. When: Poor earnings, Poor Industry conditions. Buy belowbook value (BV) per share. Examples: insurance, banks. Use global searchapproach to uncover stocks below BV. Sometimes stocks sell below cash balances.Buying stocks that sell cheaply when compared to asset values works.
Chapter 6: Global search for value Global economy; high correlation in world markets; globaldiversification is tough. Real reason is to increase the number of potentialvalue ideas. At times of Regional economic problems, values can be found.Examples: Asian collapse in 98, Germany reunion in 80s. (My inference: Lookslike crisis in Europe would present good buying in companies that are strong,profitable, stable earnings and good balance sheet.) Rising interest rates areenemy of the markets. Sell offs happen. Value deals can be found. (This wouldhappen sometime in the future when rates go up).  
Chapter 7: Value in friendlycountries– International investing is easierwith standardized international accounting (IFRS) Example of Roche which setupContingent liabilities reserves in profitable years. Then, after reserve wasreversed, they would add it directly to book value and not have to report asincome. (Swiss laws allowed this). Example of Lindt and Sprungli. 10x p/e. Swissmarket down due to higher inflation, CEO had divorced. Traded at 3.5x EBITDA.Similar companies bought for 20x earnings. Countries author avoids such asArgentina, Venezuela, Russian crisis example, Mexico, Bolivia, Asian financialcrisis. Now, China. Government control and policies, appropriation means thatmargin of safety is lacking. Author prefers looking at developed economies.
Chapter 8: Buy when insiders buy – Insider buying can help find companies whose fortunescould turn for the better. – Insiders could sell for various reasons and is notas useful. – there is only one logical reason to buy – they think stock priceis going up. – Insider buying of stocks selling at low P/E or below asset valueis even better. – Corp buybacks are another good sign. – Look for presence ofActivist investors. – Insider buying and activist investors can act as catalystfor stock appreciation.  
Chapter 9: Falling prices can be adouble edged sword Markets fall time and again becauseof political or economic announcements. Similarly, individual stocks andsectors often fall on weaker than expected earnings or unforeseen events. Thisis the time to be buying, but investors panic and go to cash. Risk is moreoften in the price you pay than the stock itself Prices of solid companieswith strong balance sheets and earnings usually recover. If the fundamentalsare found, prices always have and will always recover. Today’s worst stocksbecome tomorrow’s best stocks and the darlings of the day turn into tomorrow’sspinsters. Don’t try to catch an overpriced, cheaply made falling knife.Example of S&L crisis (very similar to current financial crisis), Big bankssuch as Bank of America and Chase Manhattan Bank fell to prices at or belowtheir book value and had P/E ratios in single digits. Wells Fargo was hit harddue to high exposure to California real estate market (sound familiar ??).Investors who did their homework and investing in banks during this time earnedenormous returns over the decade that followed as the industry went through amerger boom. In 1992, health care reform proposal caused stocks of leading drugcompanies such as Johnson and Johnson to decline sharply. JNJ traded at 12xP/E. Amex after 9/11 sold at 12x P/E Bargains are found in new low lists.
Chapter 10: Seek value the modernway Describes Grahams Net-nets method.Net Current Assets = Current Assets (cash + inventory + receivables) – TotalLiabilities NCAV = Net current assets / Shares outstanding If stock is tradingat 2/3rd of NCAV or less, Graham bought it. Talks about how modern day screenersmake finding value easy. Lists of new lows WSJ, Barron’s, IBD are good startingpoints in search for value. He cautions that such lists or screened results arejust a starting point and not the destination. He expects the investor to examinethe firms to make sure they are good and cheap. Another approach is to look atwhat other value investors have in their portfolios via their quarterly lettersand from Morningstar. Look at what who else owns a particular stock. Look atprices paid in mergers and acquisitions to find stocks that are selling at asignificant discount to what they are worth to a knowledgeable buyer. Look atother companies in the same industry and compare P/E, P/S and P/B. When anacquisition happens, you can take the purchase price to calculate the P/S, P/E,P/EBIT/, EV / EBITDA etc and keep them for future reference.  
Chapter 11: When a bargain is NOT abargain? This Chapter deals with companies toavoid. Many companies are cheap for a reason. They have fundamental problems.We have to determine why a company’s shares are cheap and which ones havelittle chance of recovery. Why do stocks become cheap 1) Company has taken ontoo much debt. – Future is unknown. If you have too much debt, smaller chanceof surviving an economic downturn. Graham’s simple method: Company should owntwice as much as it owes. Avoid others. 2) Company falls short of analysts’earnings estimates. – May create a value opportunity. However, if trendscontinue price likely to fall. 3) Cyclical stocks (automobiles, largeappliances, steel and construction) Avoid overly leveraged companies. 4) Laborcontract issues. (Big Three Auto, Airlines) – Unfunded pensions that are large.Companies may not be able to pay. Avoid such companies. 5) Increased competition- If facing strong competition from a more efficient competitor with lowercosts, then move on to the next candidate. 6) Obsolescence (Blockbuster) -Avoid companies that are subject to technological obsolescence. 7) Corporate oraccounting fraud. – No way to uncover before it becomes public – stay away fromcompanies whose financial reports are overly complicated. Best companies arethose that can be easily understood. And if they have a moat, it is evenbetter. Moat can be in the form of patents, brand name, or Size. (Walmart)Moats do not last forever, but allow a company to make profits for many years.Chris likes businesses he understands and for which there is ongoing needExamples: Banking, Food, and Beverage, Consumer staples like detergents,toothpaste, pens, and pencils. People tend to use the same products over andover again. Skepticism is needed when considering candidates.  
Chapter 12: Balance sheet checkup– Start with the balance sheet. – Liquidity – Avoid too muchdebt. – Current ratio = current assets / current liabilities. Ability to payshort term obligations. Rule of thumb is 2. Could vary by business. Comparethis to other companies in the industry. Also look at it over several years.Declining ratio may indicate liquidity problem. – Working capital. – QuickRatio – Inventory level and growth with respect to sales over several years. -Check long term liabilities versus assets over years. – Computer shareholderequity or book value. Subtract intangibles (patents, trademarks) – Debt to Equityratio – Take both ST and LT debt./ shareholder equity. Compare this number toother companies in the industry – The less debt means greater margin of safety.- Evaluate levels and also the trends across years. – If BV is a lot ofintangible assets like goodwill or excess inventory in relation to sales, itmay not be quite the bargain on a P/B basis. – Sometimes BV is understated.Land or stock investments may be carried at cost. This has been true over theyears in foreign stocks in particular. Winning means not losing. Strong balancesheet shows ability to survive when the going gets tough.  
Chapter 13: Income statement checkup
         Explanation of the key terms andline items of an income statement.
         Compare revenues across theyears to see growth.
         See revenues from differentdivisions to spot problems or spot strength in core business.
         See COGS as a % of sales.
         Steady gross profit means steadybusiness and the better it is.
         SGA, the lower this number as % ofsales the better.
         EBIT or operating profit is used bythe author in valuation ( also Magic Formula )
Look closely at one timecharges. Back out one time charges as earnings may be grossly inflated due toone time gains or conversely earnings may look depleted due to one timecharges.
Calculateboth EPS and Diluted EPS. If the difference is vast, then the stock isnot as undervalued as originally thought.
– Use EBIT to determine EPS andDiluted EPS as it’s an accurate measure of corporate earning power.
Most revealing aspect of Incomestatement is the trend over 5 or 10 years.
         Revenues rising?
         Expenses in line with revenues?
         Consistency of profits
         Cyclical earnings
         Growing profits
         Lot of one time charges?
         Shares outstanding: Are they growing,flat or falling?
– Return on capital and trends.Minimum is stability. Growing is even better. Declining ROC consistently isbad. Poor management
– Net profit margin. Falling margincould indicate bloated overhead, careless management or high competition. He likes to see consistent profit margins at least.
If you cannot understand the incomestatement of a company, just walk away from it.
 
Chapter 14: Thorough examination ofan investment candidate (IMPORTANT)
Assume you have looked at book value;earnings are cheap, balance sheet analysis already.
  1. Does company have pricing power? What is the outlook for prices?
  2. Can the company sell more? Outlook for units?
  3. Can company increase profits on existing sales? Outlook for Gross profit margin as % of sales.
  4. Can the company control expenses? Outlook for SGA as a % of sales
  5. If company raises sales, how much of it will fall to the bottom line
  6. Can the company be as profitable as it used to be or at least as profitable as competitors?
  7. Does the company have one-time expenses that will not have to be paid in the future?
  8. Does the company have unprofitable operations that can be shut?
  9. Is the company comfortable with Wall Street earnings estimates?
  10. How much can the company grow over the next five years? How will growth be achieved?
  11. What will the company do with the excess cash generated by the business? Dividends? New stores/ factories? Acquisitions/ Buy back of shares?
  12. What does the company expect its competitors to do?
  13. How does the company compare financially with other companies in the same business?
  14. What would the company be worth if it were sold?
  15. Does the company plan to buy back stock? (Is the company following up on its announced buy back?)
  16. What are the insiders doing?
Chapter 15:  Internationalaccounting
– Companies in US have two sets ofbooks, one for IRS and one for investors
– In Europe, only one set of books.
– Example of Lindt. P/E on surfacewas 10 which was attractive by itself for a major consumer brand. Looking atdepreciation and comparing to others, Lindt had high depreciation as % ofsales. Double of industry. After adjusting this, the P/E was 7.5.
– Usually such rules meant lowerearnings were reported and lower asset values (as compared to US rules).
– ADRs make it easy to invest ininternational companies.
Chapter 16: Currency issues, hedging
– When you invest in foreign stocks,another aspect to consider is the currency. Currency could fluctuate againstyour local currency. You could choose to hedge the currency so that your returnis dependent on the underlying investment.
– Example: If you buy 1000 poundsworth of a company stock, you could SELL a currency forward contract for 1000pounds.
– Another idea is to not hedge forcurrency. Over long periods, currency effects are neutral.
– What does not work is switchingfrom hedged to unhedged approach depending on your guess of the currencymovements.
Chapter 17: Market timing does notwork. Avoid it.
= 80-90% of the stock returns comefrom 2-7% of the time.
Chapter 18: Stocks versus Bonds.Avoid Bonds if you have a long term horizon.
In Jeremy Siegels’ book Stocksfor the Long Run, he shows that stocks as measured by an index beat bondsand cash in every 30 year rolling period from 1871 to 1992.  In 10 yearrolling periods, stocks beat bonds 80% of the time.
– Keep 3 years of spending in shortterm bonds/ cash. You will then not have to sell stocks when they are at theirlowest.
Chapter 19: How do you pick a moneymanager?
1) Does the manager have aninvestment approach and can explain it to you or any layperson in plainEnglish. Has he applied it consistently over time?
2) How is his Track record? Min 5years, Prefer 10 years.
3) Whose record is it? Is it themanager who is presenting or his predecessor?
4) Do they eat their own cooking?
5) Does he own the investmentmanagement firm?
Chapter 20:  Why do people notfollow value investing principles?
– Temperament: Read Behavioralfinance.
– Herd instinct. People feelconfident when investing with the crowd.
– Reputational and career risk ofbeing a contrarian.
– Periods of underperformance whenfollowing value investing.
– Courage is needed to buy out offavor companies. These are boring investments often.
– People seek instant gratification.
– Value investors are like farmers.They plant seeds and wait for the crops to grow.
– Overconfidence is another flaw ofinvestors.
– The investment world equatesactivity with intelligence.
– Good long term performance resultsfrom beating the market in bad times.
– Caution should not be seasonal.
– Maintaining a steady state of mindin good and bad times is the key to successful long term investing.
– Indexes can be victims of bubbles.SP500 in 1999 was 30% tech. 
– Lot of pressures against valueinvestors.
 Chapter 21: Stick to yourguns
– Value investing requires moreeffort than brains and a lot of patience.
– Growth and value are joined at thehip. Difference is a question of price. 
– Track acquisitions. P/BV, EV/EBIT.Use this to screen companies that are selling in the stock market at asignificant discount to what an LBO group may pay. This is called the”appraisal method”. 3rd approach along with P/E and P/B.
– Buying stocks for less than theyare worth and selling them as they approach their true worth is at the heart ofvalue investing.
– Buy below intrinsic value with amargin of safety, exercise patience.
– Patience is the hardest part ofusing the value approach.
Posted in Books, Tweedy Browne, value investing | Comments Off on Book Summary – The Little Book of Value Investing by Chris Browne

Lessons from – “The five rules for successful stock investing” by Pat Dorsey.


Pat Dorsey is the Director of Stock Analysis at Morningstar.
·        Picking individual stocks requires hard work,discipline and an investment of time (and money)
·        You need patience, an understanding ofaccounting and competitive strategy and a healthy dose of skepticism
·        Buying stock means part ownership in a business
·        Courage of conviction
·        Companies with most conflict of opinion areoften best investments ( think contrarian)
Chapter 1
·        Coreprinciples of investing
o  Doing your homework
o  Finding companies with strong competitiveadvantages
o  Having a margin of safety
o  Holding for the long term
o  Knowing when to sell
Chapter 2
·        Whatmistakes to avoid
o  Swinging for the fences
o  Believing its different this time.
o  Falling in love with products
o  Panicking when the market is down
o  Trying to time the market
o  Ignoring valuation
o  Relying on earnings for the whole story
Chapter 3 Moats
o  Firms that earn high profits.
o  Focus on FCF, net margins, ROE and ROA
o  Source of moat
§ Product differentiation
§ Driving costs down
§ High switching costs for customers
§ High barriers to entry for competitors
o  Moats have depth (how much money can be made)and width ( how long can they sustain it)
Chapter 6: Company analysis
·        Checklist to analyze a company
o  Can growth be sustained over time? Source of growth
o  Growth via acquisition is not sustainable,usually acquisitions don’t produce returns for shareholders of acquiring firm,difficult to evaluate true growth rate
o  If Earnings growth outstrips sales growth, needto investigate
o  ROE is a good measure of profitability but checkthe leverage levels that can make ROE look better.
o  Be wary of companies with too much financialleverage
Chapter 7: Management evaluation
·        Checklist to evaluate management
o  Compensation information from the proxystatement. Does pay vary with firms performance.  Check pay package.
o  Avoid companies that give loans to executives,have many related party transactions or give out too many stock options. Lookfor executives that have substantial stock ownership positions.
Chapter 8: Avoiding financial Fakery
Six red flags
1.      Declining cash from operations even as netincome increases or cash from operations increases slowly compared to netincome
2.      Firms that take frequent one-time charges andwrite-downs.
3.      Serial acquirers
4.      CFO or Auditor leaves the company.
5.      If A/R increases rapidly compared to sales. Ifsales go up by 10% and A/R by 20%, the company is booking sales faster than itsreceiving cash from customers. Also, watch for “allowance for doubtfulaccounts”. This should move up in sync with A/R.
6.      Changes in credit terms and accounts receivable.
Seven pitfalls to watch out for:
o  Gains from investments recorded as revenue
o  Underfunded Pension plan
o  Pension padding : Subtract gains on pension planfrom net income.
o  Cash flow due to options exercise by employees
o  Inventories rising faster than sales
o  Changes in accounting assumptions such asdepreciation expenses, allowance for doubtful accounts, revenue recognition,expense recognition.
o  Capitalizing costs such as marketing andsoftware development.
Chapter 9: Valuation
·        Buy undervalued relative to earnings potential
·        Don’t rely on a single valuation metric
·        If firm is cyclical or spotty earnings history,use P/S
·        P/B used for financial firms and with tangibleassets. Least useful for service oriented firms.
·        P/E can be compared to the market, similar  firm or firm’s historical P/E ( mostreliable)
·        Use PEG with caution.
·        Lowest P/E isn’t always the best. Prefer lowrisk stable firm that produces good FCF than paying less for a cyclical companythat is very capital intensive.
Chapter 11: Worth the price of the book.  Complete analysis on two companies based oneverything in the book ( moat, financial statement analysis, management andcompany analysis, valuation and DCF)
Chapter 12: 10 Minute test
Here Dorsey proposes a list of question to ask of anycompany so that we can eliminate the poor investment candidates from the goodones really fast.
1.      Min quality hurdle
a.      Avoid IPOs and avoid companies that trade onpink sheets and micro caps.         
2.      Has the company ever made an operating profit?
3.      Does the company generate consistent cash flowfrom operations?
4.      Is ROE consistently over 10% with reasonableleverage?
5.      Is earnings growth consistent or erratic?
6.      How clean is the balance sheet?
a.      If D/E is greater than 1,
                                                              i.     Is the firm in a stable business?
                                                            ii.     Has debt been going down or up as a % of  total assets
                                                           iii.     Do you understand the debt?
7.      Does the firm generate FCF?
8.      Are there many one-time charges?
9.      Has the number of shares outstanding increasedmarkedly over the past several years?
Beyond 10 minutes
·        Look at 10 year summary financial statements.
·        Read  thelatest 10-K filing front to back.
o  Company, industry, risks, competition, legalissues, MDA, loans, guarantees, contractual obligations.
o  Read two most recent proxies DEF-14A. Look forreasonable compensation and options granting policy.
o  Read last 3 annual reports.
o  Look at two most recent 10-Q filings.
o  Start valuation of the stock.
Chapter 13 – 26 : Covers  major industries and whatto look for in those companies, valuation, etc.
This is excellent material and a good way to learn about thedifferent industries, how to understand them, what makes them tick, what areways to value them.

 

Posted in Books, Pat Dorsey | Comments Off on Lessons from – “The five rules for successful stock investing” by Pat Dorsey.

Good companies v/s Good Investments

Brandes is a investment management firm that follows the value investing philosophy. I found a hand out on their site that explains that a good company is not necessarily a good investment.


“One concept that value investors keep in mind is that a good companyis not necessarily the same as a good investment. An established firmwith high revenue levels and a stable, strong earnings record, forinstance, certainly sounds like a good company. But like any company,that firm only represents a good investment if it can be purchased at afavorable price.” The article gave the example of Cisco in the 2000s asa solid company, but was over-priced, $465 billion to be exact, which“dwarfed its $15 billion revenue and $2.5 billion net income”.


In this case, Cisco was a good company that turned out to be a rather bad investment. As of July 11, 2010, the market cap for Cisco stood at about $130 billion – still down 72% from its peak. I actually owned shares of Cisco in late 1999. I bought simply on the basis that I felt Cisco was the leader in the networking and internet router business. I had no idea about valuation and what it meant. Simply put, I was just speculating. In fact, I even had a 50% gain on my investment. However, I held on as I had heard that investing is “buy and hold” and investing is for the long term. I did not want to be considered a speculator by selling my investments so soon. Little did i realize that investing without doing any due diligence on the company as well as its valuation is also a form of speculation. “A fool and his money are soon parted”.   
I can vouch for that. I sold my shares after two more years at a steep loss.


On the other hand, many good investments are not necessarily ‘good’ companies. They do not have the high sales and earnings growth, they could be down in the dumps ( Cyclical companies), they could be unloved due to temporary issues surrounding them be it legal, competitive, regulatory. These could well turn out to be excellent investments. 


What one should remember is that buying shares of a company just because you know about the company or like its products is not enough. Investments usually are profitable when you pay less than what they are worth. 

Posted in value investing | Comments Off on Good companies v/s Good Investments

Walter Schloss: 16 Golden Rules of Investing

Walter Schloss is a well regarded value investor. Schloss took courses under Ben Graham and then worked for him in the Graham-Newman Partnership. In 1955, Schloss started his own investment management firm. Schloss averaged 15.3% compound returns over the course of five decades, versus 10% for the S&P 500. Warren Buffett named him as one of The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville

I found an article that lists his 16 golden rules to investing. Here they are.

1. Price is the most important factor to use in relation to value
2. Try to establish the value of the company. Remember that a share of stock represents a part of a business and is not just a piece of paper.
3. Use book value as a starting point to try and establish the value of the enterprise. Be sure that debt does not equal 100% of the equity. (Capital and surplus for the common stock).
4. Have patience. Stocks don’t go up immediately.
5. Don’t buy on tips or for a quick move. Let the professionals do that, if they can. Don’t sell on bad news.
6. Don’t be afraid to be a loner but be sure that you are correct in your judgment. You can’t be 100% certain but try to look for the weaknesses in your thinking. Buy on a scale down and sell on a scale up.
7. Have the courage of your convictions once you have made a decision.
8. Have a philosophy of investment and try to follow it. The above is a way that I’ve found successful.
9. Don’t be in too much of a hurry to see. If the stock reaches a price that you think is a fair one, then you can sell but often because a stock goes up say 50%, people say sell it and button up your profit. Before selling try to reevaluate the company again and see where the stock sells in relation to its book value. Be aware of the level of the stock market. Are yields low and P-E rations high. If the stock market historically high. Are people very optimistic etc?
10. When buying a stock, I find it heldful to buy near the low of the past few years. A stock may go as high as 125 and then decline to 60 and you think it attractive. 3 yeas before the stock sold at 20 which shows that there is some vulnerability in it.
11. Try to buy assets at a discount than to buy earnings. Earning can change dramatically in a short time. Usually assets change slowly. One has to know much more about a company if one buys earnings.
12. Listen to suggestions from people you respect. This doesn’t mean you have to accept them. Remember it’s your money and generally it is harder to keep money than to make it. Once you lose a lot of money, it is hard to make it back.
13. Try not to let your emotions affect your judgment. Fear and greed are probably the worst emotions to have inconnection with purchase and sale of stocks.
14. Remember the work compounding. For example, if you can make 12% a year and reinvest the money back, you will double your money in 6 yrs, taxes excluded. Remember the rule of 72. Your rate of return into 72 will tell you the number of years to double your money.
15. Prefer stock over bonds. Bonds will limit your gains and inflation will reduce your purchasing power.
16. Be careful of leverage. It can go against you.

Posted in Investing Rules, value investing, Walter Schloss | Comments Off on Walter Schloss: 16 Golden Rules of Investing